Related topics

Installing Microsoft Offfice97 Pro on Windows XP Pro
That would require licensees for their code, application compatibility and collaboration. Personally, I feel it is better to have the competition because it delivers a better choice for you, the customer. -- Victor Grech [Symantec Corp.] Please continue to post your messages to the public discussion groups as

Dual Domains..MM sez: "SBS2000 newsgroup...Complete morons!"
Also, it's known that application compatibility is one major issue still plaguing Win2000. There's a discussion of that issue a few weeks back, plus this URL http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,388864,00.html There have been questions here about use of PB & Win2000, but they haven't received many

comp.unix.bsd.advocacy
Order the Motorola Buzz Download Free Ringtones: Download Games: Download Wallpapers Application Platform - Java, Network Compatibility - iDEN 800, .... them religious mmotorola leg support m9torola tall discussion rintones prepare mainly downnloads relate value nava panel patient downloafs primary exhibition

OS/2 for Windows?
English is the preferred language as it gives the most people a chance to join the discussion but you can really use any language you like as there is bound to be at A: Download the Application Compatibility Toolkit from http://msdn.microsoft.com/compatibility/ The AppFix.exe file included contains several

Linux Conference at Open Systems World
A: For the discussion of all things related to the game of Everquest. 2. Questions about Everquest 2.1 Q: What is Everquest? .... First, you'll need the Windows Application Compatibility Toolkit. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/appcompatibility/toolkit.mspx or if it wraps http://tinyurl.com/9bf1 You'll need to

Why Excessive bundling is bad
Ralph nt_consultin...@yahoo.com microsoft public vb general discussion "Maury Markowitz" <MauryMarkow...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message It can't be a compatibility problem, because it's a new application on both machines. It's not a registration problem, because I use the same methods on both

OS/2 New User Introduction (ATTENTION)
Chris replytogr...@thisforum.now stardock discussion stardock discussion technology In article <RM#M$qkTCHA.1...@prospero.stardock.com>, da_asmo...@hotmail.com says These things are the same basic type of software, they are OS's but they don't have the same features (most notably the application compatibility).

And some more info on hacking
... said the company was heeding user requests when XP was designed: "What customers were demanding was network compatibility, application compatibility. In the process he invokes 'vulnerabilities in rpc.statd and wuftpd' thereby bending the discussion away from your original and well laid out points.

Namespaces and VB6
It's called "side-by-side", and details are here: The End of DLL Hell http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/techart/dlldanger1.htm Windows 2000 Application Compatibility http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/techart/win2000appcomp.htm If I wanted to statically link to MFC42, how would I go about doing so?

Another Spiffy Windows XP Feature
Nicholas Hanson da_asmo...@hotmail.com stardock discussion stardock discussion technology "Chris Hoffmann" <chris.hoffm...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message These things are the same basic type of software, they are OS's but they don't have the same features (most notably the application compatibility).

Disk Optimization setting & Speed Disk
... but we'd be glad to hear of any WinXP SP2 application compatibility issues with MBSA 1.2 to confirm we can have all of these resolved at the time the final version of WinXP SP2 is publicly released. I hope that helps... -- Doug Neal [MSFT] d...@online.microsoft.com If newsgroup discussion with experts and MVPs

Times Two (was Re: Autodoubler & other transparent compression progs)
... Matthew Gardiner in article <9ugn79$8drs...@ID-119715.news.dfncis.de> dashed off: Oh, just for sake of discussion, it's entirely possible I could have, I repeated on several occasions that it shouldn't matter, then he continued talking about kernel application compatibility, I then continued saying that was

7017
(now we jump to another NG for TS related discussion by people we believe to be more in tune with the real world.) - Before I get there two days later, ..... are only now beginning to design applications correctly for TS; as a result, a Terminal Server has to do all sorts of extra application compatibility work.

freebsd-hackers Digest, Vol 256, Issue 9
Oh, just for sake of discussion, it's entirely possible I could have, under Windows, located and saved the various program's registry settings, I repeated on several occasions that it shouldn't matter, then he continued talking about kernel application compatibility, I then continued saying that was the point

COOA Charter
Jimmy S. n...@m.pls microsoft public games discussion Hi rubyjack, Glad to hear that your game is running again! :-) rubyjack Wrote: ================= From a long In there is a utility called the Application Compatibility Tool. This tool allows greater control over the W95 software, and got me up and running.

Motorola Nextel Iden Free Downloads Ringtones Java
Is there another Discussion Group I should go to where I can get more help in answering these types of questions? "Jeff Richards" wrote: If you are starting this Its simply to get compatibility between my two machines and the rest of the world. I would like to load the latest Acrobat which I can't with W98.

Why Excessive bundling is bad
M$ application compatibility is extremely poor as there are no real standards for anything. M$ basically make it up as they go along. Standards are often varied to lock out .... Do not attempt to engage in discussion, simply repeat your mantra. See Mein Kampf for details. The aim is to get *only* your view out there.

MORE XP PROBLEMS
He also was part of a 2-hour roundtable discussion with IBM's CEO and LinuxKorea's CEO. Several partners (including Compaq, IBM and Kolon) attended Caldera's .... Open UNIX 8 allows for Linux application compatibility via the integration of the Linux Kernel Personality (LKP). In addition, Open UNIX 8 improves

App Compatibility and Future Versions of Windows
Maury Markowitz MauryMarkow...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public vb general discussion "Ralph" wrote: What is the actual error message? It can't be a compatibility problem, because it's a new application on both machines. It's not a registration problem, because I use the same methods on both machines.

Installing game for win98 to winxp
Howerver, IMHO the much more possible task is bringing Linux to OS/2, in a terms of application compatibility, and I think it's better too, because: 1. X11 applications could use XFree86/2, which is allready available. Nenad -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion