Related topics

The new Mac
Unless I wanted to become more intimately involved in the project itself, then a such a peripheral forum for discussion is certainly valid. If you look at 'licenses', kernel features/APIs, utilities, drivers, applications and application compatibility, these are ALL features of the OS distribution.

COOA Charter
Jim Kelly obrie...@email.msn.com microsoft public win95 general discussion ------------------------------------------------------------ README for Internet Explorer 4.0 ..... APPLICATION COMPATIBILITY ========================= Adobe Acrobat: Using Internet Explorer 4.0 with Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0

Digger 's
They are well thought out to ensure maximum compatibility. If I want a GNU-compatible find on FreeBSD, I can install the misc/findutils port. If I really wanted the GNU toolset, ..... I can see both sides of this discussion, but I did want to add some hopefully thought-provoking comments late on a Saturday night].

find -lname and -ilname implemented
... $100 from most software dealers) if you are upgrading from DOS or a previous version of OS/2, you do not have Windows 3.1, and you want Windows application compatibility. .... Also, if you would like to see a feature added to OS/2 in a future version, post here. comp.os.os2.misc For general OS/2 discussion.

Microsoft Windows: Insecure by Design
As a result, advocacy of eCS becomes a discussion on what is wrong with OS/2 and why eCS will 'improve' it. Advocacy of OS/2 OTOH is a discussion on the more to future divergence from the IBM OS/2 platform and I was also referring to both the OS/2 platform compatibility and OS/2 application compatibility.

Third party application compatibility list
The Internet Explorer 7 RC1 build includes improvements in performance, stability, security, and application compatibility. With this build, Microsoft has also made enhancements to the fit and finish of the user interface, completed CSS platform changes, added language support, and included an auto-uninstall

[IT_Group:5275] Fw: Windows Vista SP1 is here!
Alex K. Angelopoulos \(MVP\) a...@mvps.org microsoft public vb general discussion CC'd to poster since they may no longer be monitoring ---- This is going to be 1 of 3 possible issues; If you install to a system folder, application compatibility code will likely redirect the files to the user's home directory.

Linux is garbage
Steve Easton ad...@95isalive.com microsoft public vb general discussion "Ralph" <nt_consultin...@yahoo.com> wrote in message Reason I ask is because the Application Compatibility Toolkit, that checks for user issues for @#$%^& Vista keeps complaining that the app has no namespace.

...and you thought this this only happened with NT...
I can't program (that well), and I contribute a *lot* It's discussion only ATM. I'm not sure if I agree with the project anyway. What's the point inventing Go for a RISC OS environment (like ROX) and application compatibility (like Riscose) on top of nice *existing* OS (like OpenBSD). See above. Why not join ?

Is Anyone Staying With VB6?
***MB - Always willing to contribute to the discussion. Thanks again Julio Mike Brannigan [MS] <mikeb...@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message **MB - it is not illegal as you CHOOSE to upgrade and we make every effort to check application compatibility. If you download and run the checker before purchase or do

White paper on Terminal Server and Winfax
Anyone know if this page is still up by IP address, or perhaps was mirrored somewhere? If not, I'd be willing to volunteer to put it back up... -Joan Touzet -jo...@my-dejanews.com -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your.

Backup before upgrade to XP?
The discussion focuses on compatibility issues involving Windows-based applications, Windows display drivers, and MS-DOSO-based applications. Guidelines for Windows-based Application Developers Keep these general rules in mind when developing applications for Microsoft Windows : * The golden rule of application

FAQ 3/31/04
COM comp os vms First off, I apologize to the rest of the readers of this newsgroup for waisting bandwidth continuing this discussion. I'll try and restrain myself We always get definitive statements from vendors as to OS Release/application compatibility before attempting upgrades. If a vendor is silent on the

And some more info on hacking
At the risk of being taken for an OS/2 advocate I'll forward this post I got off the OS2 discussion group. .... and since OS/2 for Windows needs the existing Windows code on your hard disk to provide Windows application compatibility, the part of your hard disk which holds Windows 3.1 must be FAT.

Afterdark 4.0 and XP
The installation script adds the %systemroot%\Application Compatibility Scripts\Logon\Ofc97Usr.Cmd script to UsrLogn2.cmd. This script ensures that the needed HV * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

Mac OS X: a misnomer.
JERRY BOHLEY jer...@netzero.net microsoft public windowsxp general As long as we have an AfterDark discussion going ... I have version 3.2 on Cd However, if you install the Application Compatibility Toolkit from your CD (in the support/tools directory--install act or act20), it has a setting for After Dark 4.0.

Odd DCOM problem
Do you have either a list of applications that have been tested to work with pcANYWHERE32 or a list of applications that has been demonstrated NOT to work with pcANYWHERE? Hello Jim, Thank you for using our online discussion groups. Due to the large quantity and diversity of third party programs available on the

Installing game for win98 to winxp
DISCUSSION Contents Introduction Files added by the Open Transport installer Open Transport AppleTalk features - Static and dynamic AppleTalk address PPP connectivity Memory requirements Application compatibility guidelines Performance also -------------------------- Open Transport TCP/IP Configuration Article

Job Application Blank
Michael Block deepthoughtps...@netscape.net stardock discussion technology stardock os2 Martin Nisshagen wrote: You didn't talk about cross platform software speed test, you talked about application compatibility (which I do agree is important for an end user, but wasn't what this topic was about).

Microsoft Doesn't lie - Ya right - The series... Part II
Jimmy S. Private microsoft public games discussion Hi Tuti, Your DX diagnostics is fine. Is that the old Windows 95 Diggers? If so, maybe this will help. you can click the link in the Compatibility tab that reads "Learn more about program compatibility", or watch this Application Compatibility Power Point